FDA Medical Device Cybersecurity Compliance

FDA Medical Device Cybersecurity Compliance

FDA Medical Device Cybersecurity Compliance

Cybersecurity & Data Protection Laws

🇺🇸 FDA Medical Device Cybersecurity
🇺🇸 FDA Medical Device Cybersecurity

FDA Rejected 700% More Submissions for Cybersecurity Deficiencies Since 2023. Is Your Next Premarket Filing Ready?

FDA Rejected 700% More Submissions for Cybersecurity Deficiencies Since 2023. Is Your Next Premarket Filing Ready?

FDA Rejected 700% More Submissions for Cybersecurity Deficiencies Since 2023. Is Your Next Premarket Filing Ready?

FDA medical device cybersecurity compliance now requires mandatory SBOMs, vulnerability management plans, and coordinated disclosure processes for every cyber device. Section 524B of the FD&C Act makes cybersecurity a legal prerequisite for market authorization—not a recommendation. The June 2025 final guidance consolidates all requirements into 12 mandatory eSTAR documents. Certivo automates cybersecurity evidence collection from supplier SBOM data through audit-ready premarket submission packages.

FDA medical device cybersecurity compliance now requires mandatory SBOMs, vulnerability management plans, and coordinated disclosure processes for every cyber device. Section 524B of the FD&C Act makes cybersecurity a legal prerequisite for market authorization—not a recommendation. The June 2025 final guidance consolidates all requirements into 12 mandatory eSTAR documents. Certivo automates cybersecurity evidence collection from supplier SBOM data through audit-ready premarket submission packages.

FDA medical device cybersecurity compliance now requires mandatory SBOMs, vulnerability management plans, and coordinated disclosure processes for every cyber device. Section 524B of the FD&C Act makes cybersecurity a legal prerequisite for market authorization—not a recommendation. The June 2025 final guidance consolidates all requirements into 12 mandatory eSTAR documents. Certivo automates cybersecurity evidence collection from supplier SBOM data through audit-ready premarket submission packages.

12

12

12

Required cybersecurity documents in eSTAR submissions

524B

524B

524B

FD&C Act section making cybersecurity legally mandatory

€15M+

€15M+

€15M+

Potential revenue loss from refused or delayed submissions

Regulation Overview

Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

Jurisdiction

United States (applies to all manufacturers marketing cyber devices in the U.S.)

United States (applies to all manufacturers marketing cyber devices in the U.S.)

Regulatory Body

Regulatory Body

Regulatory Body

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH)

U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH)

Regulation Number

Regulation Number

Regulation Number

Section 524B, FD&C Act (added by FDORA, December 2022); Final Guidance issued June 27, 2025

Section 524B, FD&C Act (added by FDORA, December 2022); Final Guidance issued June 27, 2025

Effective Date

Effective Date

Effective Date

Section 524B effective March 29, 2023; Final guidance June 27, 2025; QMSR effective February 2026

Section 524B effective March 29, 2023; Final guidance June 27, 2025; QMSR effective February 2026

Official Source

Official Source

Official Source

https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/digital-health-center-excellence/cybersecurity

Key Threshold

Key Threshold

Key Threshold

All cyber devices—any device containing software or that is itself software

All cyber devices—any device containing software or that is itself software

What is FDA Medical Device Cybersecurity Guidance?

What is FDA Medical Device Cybersecurity Guidance?

What is FDA Medical Device Cybersecurity Guidance?

FDA medical device cybersecurity guidance is the primary regulatory framework governing cybersecurity requirements for medical devices sold in the United States. Section 524B of the FD&C Act, enacted through FDORA in December 2022, makes cybersecurity a mandatory component of every premarket submission for cyber devices. The June 2025 final guidance supersedes all prior versions and consolidates FDA's expectations into a single document. FDA now defines a cyber device as any device that contains software or is itself software—regardless of network connectivity. Manufacturers must demonstrate reasonable assurance of cybersecurity through SBOMs, vulnerability management plans, threat models, security testing results, and coordinated vulnerability disclosure policies. FDA medical device cybersecurity compliance requires component-level software transparency from every supplier in the device's software supply chain. The eSTAR submission template requires 12 specific cybersecurity documents. Submissions lacking cybersecurity documentation are subject to Refuse to Accept decisions.

Key Components / Sub-Frameworks

Obligation

Mandatory SBOM, vulnerability plan, and reasonable assurance of cybersecurity

Section 524B (FD&C Act)

Statutory cybersecurity requirements for cyber devices

Section 524B (FD&C Act)

Statutory cybersecurity requirements for cyber devices

Obligation

Mandatory SBOM, vulnerability plan, and reasonable assurance of cybersecurity

Obligation

Security risk management from design through decommissioning

SPDF (Secure Product Development Framework)

Lifecycle security framework embedded in QMS

SPDF (Secure Product Development Framework)

Lifecycle security framework embedded in QMS

Obligation

Security risk management from design through decommissioning

Obligation

Machine-readable, covering commercial, open-source, and off-the-shelf components

SBOM Requirement

Software Bill of Materials for all software components

SBOM Requirement

Software Bill of Materials for all software components

Obligation

Machine-readable, covering commercial, open-source, and off-the-shelf components

Obligation

Coordinated disclosure, timely patches, customer notifications

Vulnerability Management Plan

Postmarket monitoring and patching obligations

Vulnerability Management Plan

Postmarket monitoring and patching obligations

Obligation

Coordinated disclosure, timely patches, customer notifications

Obligation

12 required cybersecurity documents for premarket review

eSTAR Cybersecurity Section

Standardized submission template

eSTAR Cybersecurity Section

Standardized submission template

Obligation

12 required cybersecurity documents for premarket review

Obligation

Cybersecurity risk management must integrate with QMS processes

QMSR (Feb 2026)

Quality Management System Regulation harmonized with ISO 13485

QMSR (Feb 2026)

Quality Management System Regulation harmonized with ISO 13485

Obligation

Cybersecurity risk management must integrate with QMS processes

QMSR Takes Effect February 2026Cybersecurity Must Now Map Directly to Your QMS

QMSR Takes Effect February 2026Cybersecurity Must Now Map Directly to Your QMS

QMSR Takes Effect February 2026Cybersecurity Must Now Map Directly to Your QMS

QMSR Takes Effect February 2026Cybersecurity Must Now Map Directly to Your QMS

The new Quality Management System Regulation harmonizes FDA requirements with ISO 13485 and requires cybersecurity risk management to integrate with your existing design controls. Threat models, vulnerability assessments, and security controls must map to your QMS. Submissions without this integration face Refuse to Accept decisions.

The new Quality Management System Regulation harmonizes FDA requirements with ISO 13485 and requires cybersecurity risk management to integrate with your existing design controls. Threat models, vulnerability assessments, and security controls must map to your QMS. Submissions without this integration face Refuse to Accept decisions.

The new Quality Management System Regulation harmonizes FDA requirements with ISO 13485 and requires cybersecurity risk management to integrate with your existing design controls. Threat models, vulnerability assessments, and security controls must map to your QMS. Submissions without this integration face Refuse to Accept decisions.

The new Quality Management System Regulation harmonizes FDA requirements with ISO 13485 and requires cybersecurity risk management to integrate with your existing design controls. Threat models, vulnerability assessments, and security controls must map to your QMS. Submissions without this integration face Refuse to Accept decisions.

Key Compliance Requirements

Key Compliance Requirements

Who Must Comply

Who Must Comply

Manufacturers of medical devices containing software sold in the U.S. market\nImporters and distributors placing cyber devices on the U.S. market\nContract manufacturers producing software-enabled medical devices for U.S. sponsors\nNon-U.S. companies seeking FDA clearance or approval for cyber devices\nCompanies modifying previously authorized devices requiring new premarket submissions\nSoftware suppliers providing components integrated into FDA-regulated cyber devices

Key Thresholds

Any device with software

Classified as cyber device under Section 524B—guidance applies

Any device with software

Classified as cyber device under Section 524B—guidance applies

March 29, 2023

Date Section 524B requirements became effective for all premarket submissions

March 29, 2023

Date Section 524B requirements became effective for all premarket submissions

12 documents

Required cybersecurity documentation items in eSTAR template

12 documents

Required cybersecurity documentation items in eSTAR template

30 days

Recommended timeline for customer notification of discovered vulnerabilities

30 days

Recommended timeline for customer notification of discovered vulnerabilities

Core Obligations

Core Obligations

1

SBOM Submission

Provide machine-readable SBOM listing all commercial, open-source, and off-the-shelf components

DEADLINE

Included in every premarket submission

2

Vulnerability Management Plan

Submit plan to monitor, identify, and address postmarket vulnerabilities and exploits

DEADLINE

Included in premarket submission; maintained throughout lifecycle

3

Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure

Establish and document CVD policy and procedures

DEADLINE

Required at submission; operational postmarket

4

Security Risk Assessment

Conduct cybersecurity risk assessment per SPDF covering device and related systems

DEADLINE

Documented in Design History File and premarket submission

5

Postmarket Cybersecurity Maintenance

Provide timely patches and updates; violations classified under Section 301(q)

DEADLINE

Ongoing throughout device lifecycle

1

SBOM Submission

Provide machine-readable SBOM listing all commercial, open-source, and off-the-shelf components

DEADLINE

Included in every premarket submission

2

Vulnerability Management Plan

Submit plan to monitor, identify, and address postmarket vulnerabilities and exploits

DEADLINE

Included in premarket submission; maintained throughout lifecycle

3

Coordinated Vulnerability Disclosure

Establish and document CVD policy and procedures

DEADLINE

Required at submission; operational postmarket

4

Security Risk Assessment

Conduct cybersecurity risk assessment per SPDF covering device and related systems

DEADLINE

Documented in Design History File and premarket submission

5

Postmarket Cybersecurity Maintenance

Provide timely patches and updates; violations classified under Section 301(q)

DEADLINE

Ongoing throughout device lifecycle

FDA Cybersecurity-Specific Pain Points

FDA Cybersecurity-Specific Pain Points

The SBOM Supply Chain Black Hole
The SBOM Supply Chain Black Hole
The SBOM Supply Chain Black Hole

FDA requires a complete SBOM covering every commercial, open-source, and off-the-shelf component. Your device runs on software from 30 suppliers. Eight provide no SBOM data. Five use proprietary formats. Three haven't disclosed component versions. You cannot submit without full supply chain transparency—and the eSTAR template will not let you proceed.

The Refuse to Accept Reality
The Refuse to Accept Reality
The Refuse to Accept Reality

Since October 2023, FDA cybersecurity deficiency letters have increased 700%. Submissions missing cybersecurity documentation trigger Refuse to Accept decisions—meaning your device never enters substantive review. Each rejection cycle costs months and delays market authorization while competitors clear.

The Vulnerability Management Burden
The Vulnerability Management Burden
The Vulnerability Management Burden

Section 524B requires a postmarket vulnerability management plan covering coordinated disclosure, patch timelines, and customer notification. Your device contains 200 software components from 15 suppliers. A critical CVE is published. You need to know which devices are affected, which suppliers own the component, and whether a patch exists—within hours, not weeks.

The Multi-Framework Documentation Trap
The Multi-Framework Documentation Trap
The Multi-Framework Documentation Trap

Your device ships to the U.S. and EU. FDA requires SBOM, vulnerability plan, and SPDF documentation. The EU Cyber Resilience Act requires separate conformity evidence with its own SBOM requirements. EU MDR requires additional cybersecurity risk documentation. Without a centralized compliance evidence management platform, your team maintains three parallel documentation systems for every product.

Certivo In Action

Certivo in Action FDA Cybersecurity Workflow

GET EVIDENCE IN

Collect SBOMs, Security Attestations, and Vulnerability Data from Every Supplier—Without the Chasing

CORA launches targeted campaigns to collect component-level SBOM data, supplier security attestations, and patch commitment documentation from every software supplier in your device's supply chain.

Launch SBOM collection campaigns to hundreds of suppliers with one click\nCORA-powered outreach in suppliers' native languages requesting SBOMs, CVD policies, and patch SLAs\nAccept any format: CycloneDX, SPDX, PDF attestations, Excel inventories, freeform responses\nTrack response rates and escalate non-responders automatically

GET EVIDENCE IN

Collect SBOMs, Security Attestations, and Vulnerability Data from Every Supplier—Without the Chasing

CORA launches targeted campaigns to collect component-level SBOM data, supplier security attestations, and patch commitment documentation from every software supplier in your device's supply chain.

Launch SBOM collection campaigns to hundreds of suppliers with one click\nCORA-powered outreach in suppliers' native languages requesting SBOMs, CVD policies, and patch SLAs\nAccept any format: CycloneDX, SPDX, PDF attestations, Excel inventories, freeform responses\nTrack response rates and escalate non-responders automatically

MAKE SENSE OF IT

Know Instantly Whether Your Device SBOM Meets FDA Section 524B Requirements

CORA parses supplier SBOMs, extracts component metadata to version level, validates against known vulnerability databases, and flags documentation gaps before your eSTAR submission.

CORA parses SBOMs to extract component names, versions, suppliers, and license types\nAutomatic validation against NVD, CISA KEV, and vendor-disclosed vulnerabilities\nReal-time alerts when new CVEs affect components in your device software stack\nGap analysis against the 12 eSTAR cybersecurity documentation requirements

MAKE SENSE OF IT

Know Instantly Whether Your Device SBOM Meets FDA Section 524B Requirements

CORA parses supplier SBOMs, extracts component metadata to version level, validates against known vulnerability databases, and flags documentation gaps before your eSTAR submission.

CORA parses SBOMs to extract component names, versions, suppliers, and license types\nAutomatic validation against NVD, CISA KEV, and vendor-disclosed vulnerabilities\nReal-time alerts when new CVEs affect components in your device software stack\nGap analysis against the 12 eSTAR cybersecurity documentation requirements

PROVE COMPLIANCE OUT

Generate eSTAR-Ready Cybersecurity Documentation Packages in Hours, Not Months

Produce audit-ready premarket submission packages, customer-facing vulnerability disclosures, and postmarket monitoring evidence from validated supplier data.

One-click eSTAR cybersecurity section packages aligned with all 12 required documents\nPre-formatted SBOM exports in SPDX and CycloneDX meeting FDA and NTIA requirements\nCustomer-specific vulnerability disclosure packages with full traceability\nComplete audit trail for every supplier response, validation decision, and document generation

PROVE COMPLIANCE OUT

Generate eSTAR-Ready Cybersecurity Documentation Packages in Hours, Not Months

Produce audit-ready premarket submission packages, customer-facing vulnerability disclosures, and postmarket monitoring evidence from validated supplier data.

One-click eSTAR cybersecurity section packages aligned with all 12 required documents\nPre-formatted SBOM exports in SPDX and CycloneDX meeting FDA and NTIA requirements\nCustomer-specific vulnerability disclosure packages with full traceability\nComplete audit trail for every supplier response, validation decision, and document generation

GET EVIDENCE IN

Collect SBOMs, Security Attestations, and Vulnerability Data from Every Supplier—Without the Chasing

CORA launches targeted campaigns to collect component-level SBOM data, supplier security attestations, and patch commitment documentation from every software supplier in your device's supply chain.

Launch SBOM collection campaigns to hundreds of suppliers with one click\nCORA-powered outreach in suppliers' native languages requesting SBOMs, CVD policies, and patch SLAs\nAccept any format: CycloneDX, SPDX, PDF attestations, Excel inventories, freeform responses\nTrack response rates and escalate non-responders automatically

MAKE SENSE OF IT

Know Instantly Whether Your Device SBOM Meets FDA Section 524B Requirements

CORA parses supplier SBOMs, extracts component metadata to version level, validates against known vulnerability databases, and flags documentation gaps before your eSTAR submission.

CORA parses SBOMs to extract component names, versions, suppliers, and license types\nAutomatic validation against NVD, CISA KEV, and vendor-disclosed vulnerabilities\nReal-time alerts when new CVEs affect components in your device software stack\nGap analysis against the 12 eSTAR cybersecurity documentation requirements

PROVE COMPLIANCE OUT

Generate eSTAR-Ready Cybersecurity Documentation Packages in Hours, Not Months

Produce audit-ready premarket submission packages, customer-facing vulnerability disclosures, and postmarket monitoring evidence from validated supplier data.

One-click eSTAR cybersecurity section packages aligned with all 12 required documents\nPre-formatted SBOM exports in SPDX and CycloneDX meeting FDA and NTIA requirements\nCustomer-specific vulnerability disclosure packages with full traceability\nComplete audit trail for every supplier response, validation decision, and document generation

One Supplier Submission. Validation Against All 12 eSTAR Requirements. Submission-Ready in Hours.

One Supplier Submission. Validation Against All 12 eSTAR Requirements. Submission-Ready in Hours.

One Supplier Submission. Validation Against All 12 eSTAR Requirements. Submission-Ready in Hours.

One Supplier Submission. Validation Against All 12 eSTAR Requirements. Submission-Ready in Hours.

Certivo collects supplier SBOMs and security attestations, extracts component data to version-level precision, validates against vulnerability databases and FDA documentation requirements, and generates submission-ready evidence automatically. When new CVEs emerge, Certivo reassesses your device portfolio and alerts you—before FDA or customers discover the gap.

Certivo collects supplier SBOMs and security attestations, extracts component data to version-level precision, validates against vulnerability databases and FDA documentation requirements, and generates submission-ready evidence automatically. When new CVEs emerge, Certivo reassesses your device portfolio and alerts you—before FDA or customers discover the gap.

Certivo collects supplier SBOMs and security attestations, extracts component data to version-level precision, validates against vulnerability databases and FDA documentation requirements, and generates submission-ready evidence automatically. When new CVEs emerge, Certivo reassesses your device portfolio and alerts you—before FDA or customers discover the gap.

SBOM Collection & Parsing

SBOM Collection & Parsing

eSTAR Documentation

eSTAR Documentation

Vulnerability Monitoring

Vulnerability Monitoring

524B Compliance Mapping

524B Compliance Mapping

Multi-Framework Sync

Multi-Framework Sync

Features Tabs

Features Tabs

Supplier SBOM Collection

SBOM Extraction & Normalization

Vulnerability Monitoring

eSTAR Submission Packages

Postmarket Evidence Management

Supplier SBOM Collection

Certivo's automated campaigns achieve 95% response rates vs. 20-30% with manual SBOM requests.

Targeted campaigns by device line, component type, or supplier tier\nMulti-language outreach requesting SBOMs, security attestations, and patch commitments\nIntelligent follow-up sequences adapting to supplier behavior\nFormat-agnostic: CycloneDX, SPDX, PDF, Excel, proprietary formats, freeform responses

95%

Supplier Response Rate

SBOM Extraction & Normalization

Every supplier SBOM parsed to component, version, and supplier level automatically—no manual data entry.

Deep extraction of component names, versions, suppliers, license types, and dependencies\nNormalizes CycloneDX, SPDX, and proprietary SBOM formats into unified inventory\nMulti-language document processing for security attestations and declarations\nAnomaly detection for incomplete, outdated, or inconsistent supplier data

99.2%

Extraction Accuracy

Vulnerability Monitoring

Always validated against current vulnerability databases—not your last quarterly scan.

Continuous monitoring against NVD, CISA Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog, and vendor advisories\nAutomatic device impact assessment when new CVEs are published\nProactive alerts identifying affected devices, components, and suppliers\nRisk categorization aligned with FDA's controlled vs. uncontrolled risk framework

Real-Time

CVE & CISA KEV Sync

eSTAR Submission Packages

Generate complete FDA cybersecurity documentation in hours instead of 3-6 months.

One-click generation of all 12 eSTAR cybersecurity documentation items\nSBOM exports in FDA-preferred machine-readable formats\nVulnerability management plan templates meeting Section 524B requirements\nSubmission readiness scoring with gap identification before filing

4 hours

To Submission-Ready Package

Postmarket Evidence Management

Pre-validated evidence supports ongoing Section 524B postmarket obligations.

Postmarket vulnerability monitoring with automated device-impact mapping\nCoordinated vulnerability disclosure workflow tracking\nPatch and update timeline documentation for regulatory defense\nContinuous audit-ready documentation for FDA postmarket inspections

Continuous

Lifecycle Compliance Assurance

Supplier SBOM Collection

SBOM Extraction & Normalization

Vulnerability Monitoring

eSTAR Submission Packages

Postmarket Evidence Management

Supplier SBOM Collection

Certivo's automated campaigns achieve 95% response rates vs. 20-30% with manual SBOM requests.

Targeted campaigns by device line, component type, or supplier tier\nMulti-language outreach requesting SBOMs, security attestations, and patch commitments\nIntelligent follow-up sequences adapting to supplier behavior\nFormat-agnostic: CycloneDX, SPDX, PDF, Excel, proprietary formats, freeform responses

95%

Supplier Response Rate

Supplier SBOM Collection

SBOM Extraction & Normalization

Vulnerability Monitoring

eSTAR Submission Packages

Postmarket Evidence Management

Supplier SBOM Collection

Certivo's automated campaigns achieve 95% response rates vs. 20-30% with manual SBOM requests.

Targeted campaigns by device line, component type, or supplier tier\nMulti-language outreach requesting SBOMs, security attestations, and patch commitments\nIntelligent follow-up sequences adapting to supplier behavior\nFormat-agnostic: CycloneDX, SPDX, PDF, Excel, proprietary formats, freeform responses

95%

Supplier Response Rate

Related Regulations

Related Regulations

EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)

CRA requires SBOM and cybersecurity conformity for digital products in EU; overlapping SBOM requirements

Combined Value

Single supplier SBOM collection satisfies both FDA and CRA frameworks

EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA)

CRA requires SBOM and cybersecurity conformity for digital products in EU; overlapping SBOM requirements

Combined Value

Single supplier SBOM collection satisfies both FDA and CRA frameworks

EU MDR/IVDR

EU medical device regulations with cybersecurity risk management expectations

Combined Value

Combined cybersecurity evidence packages for U.S. and EU submissions

EU MDR/IVDR

EU medical device regulations with cybersecurity risk management expectations

Combined Value

Combined cybersecurity evidence packages for U.S. and EU submissions

IEC 62443

Industrial cybersecurity standard referenced in medical device security architectures

Combined Value

Pre-mapped evidence from IEC 62443 supports FDA SPDF documentation

IEC 62443

Industrial cybersecurity standard referenced in medical device security architectures

Combined Value

Pre-mapped evidence from IEC 62443 supports FDA SPDF documentation

AAMI TIR57

Consensus standard for medical device security risk management referenced by FDA

Combined Value

Certivo maps supplier evidence to TIR57 risk management requirements

AAMI TIR57

Consensus standard for medical device security risk management referenced by FDA

Combined Value

Certivo maps supplier evidence to TIR57 risk management requirements

NIST Cybersecurity Framework

FDA references NIST for cryptography (FIPS 140-3) and vulnerability management

Combined Value

Multi-framework validation from one supplier submission

NIST Cybersecurity Framework

FDA references NIST for cryptography (FIPS 140-3) and vulnerability management

Combined Value

Multi-framework validation from one supplier submission

IEC 81001-5-1

Health software lifecycle security standard harmonized with EU MDR

Combined Value

Validates supplier data against both FDA and IEC 81001-5-1 requirements simultaneously

IEC 81001-5-1

Health software lifecycle security standard harmonized with EU MDR

Combined Value

Validates supplier data against both FDA and IEC 81001-5-1 requirements simultaneously

Managing FDA cybersecurity alongside related frameworks eliminates duplicate supplier requests. Certivo validates one submission against multiple cybersecurity and medical device frameworks.

Managing FDA cybersecurity alongside related frameworks eliminates duplicate supplier requests. Certivo validates one submission against multiple cybersecurity and medical device frameworks.

Managing FDA cybersecurity alongside related frameworks eliminates duplicate supplier requests. Certivo validates one submission against multiple cybersecurity and medical device frameworks.

Return on Investment

Return on Investment

80%
80%
80%
80%
Reduction in Submission Preparation Labor
Reduction in Submission Preparation Labor
Reduction in Submission Preparation Labor
From Manual SBOM Assembly to Automated Evidence Packages

CORA collects, parses, and validates supplier SBOM data automatically. Your team focuses on security architecture decisions—not chasing suppliers for component inventories.

4 Hours
4 Hours
4 Hours
4 Hours
To eSTAR-Ready Package
To eSTAR-Ready Package
To eSTAR-Ready Package
Premarket Submission Acceleration

Generate complete, audit-ready FDA cybersecurity documentation packages in hours—not the 3-6 months of manual compilation across suppliers and engineering teams.

Real-Time
Real-Time
Real-Time
Real-Time
Vulnerability Monitoring
Vulnerability Monitoring
Vulnerability Monitoring
Proactive Postmarket Compliance Assurance

When new CVEs are published, Certivo identifies affected devices and components instantly. Maintain continuous audit-ready documentation for FDA postmarket inspections—without reactive fire drills.

Key Statistics

12

12

12

12

eSTAR cybersecurity documents generated from validated supplier data

eSTAR cybersecurity documents generated from validated supplier data

99.2%

99.2%

99.2%

99.2%

SBOM extraction accuracy from supplier declarations

SBOM extraction accuracy from supplier declarations

95%

95%

95%

95%

Supplier response rate with CORA-powered campaigns

Supplier response rate with CORA-powered campaigns

Frequently Asked Questions

What medical devices are subject to FDA cybersecurity requirements under Section 524B?

Section 524B applies to all cyber devices—defined as any medical device that contains software or is itself software. The June 2025 final guidance clarifies that this includes devices regardless of whether they are network-enabled. If a device contains sponsor-validated software and has any capability that could enable connectivity (including USB ports), it is likely a cyber device. This covers 510(k), PMA, De Novo, PDP, and HDE submissions.

What happens if a premarket submission lacks cybersecurity documentation?

FDA applies a Refuse to Accept policy for cyber device submissions missing required cybersecurity documentation. Since October 2023, cybersecurity deficiency letters have increased approximately 700%. A refused submission never enters substantive review—delaying market authorization by months. Each resubmission cycle compounds the delay and cost. Certivo's eSTAR readiness scoring identifies documentation gaps before you file.

What SBOM format does FDA require for premarket submissions?

FDA requires a machine-readable SBOM listing all commercial, open-source, and off-the-shelf software components. SPDX and CycloneDX are the preferred formats. The SBOM must include component names, versions, supplier information, and must align with NTIA minimum SBOM requirements. CORA collects supplier SBOMs in any format and normalizes them into FDA-compliant machine-readable exports.

How does Certivo help with FDA cybersecurity premarket submissions?

Certivo collects supplier SBOMs and security attestations at scale, extracts component metadata to version level, validates against vulnerability databases, and generates all 12 eSTAR cybersecurity documentation items. CORA maps collected evidence against Section 524B requirements, identifies gaps, and produces submission-ready packages in hours. Postmarket vulnerability monitoring maintains continuous compliance evidence for FDA inspections.

How does FDA cybersecurity compliance relate to EU CRA and EU MDR requirements?

FDA Section 524B, the EU Cyber Resilience Act, and EU MDR all require cybersecurity evidence for medical devices—but with different documentation structures and submission formats. Certivo validates one supplier SBOM submission against all three frameworks simultaneously, generating FDA eSTAR packages, CRA conformity documentation, and MDR cybersecurity risk files from a single evidence collection campaign.

Ready to Automate FDA Cybersecurity Compliance?

Ready to Automate FDA Cybersecurity Compliance?

Ready to Automate FDA Cybersecurity Compliance?

Ready to Automate FDA Cybersecurity Compliance?

See how Certivo's medical device cybersecurity compliance software transforms Section 524B evidence management from reactive scrambling to continuous audit readiness.

See how Certivo's medical device cybersecurity compliance software transforms Section 524B evidence management from reactive scrambling to continuous audit readiness.

See how Certivo's medical device cybersecurity compliance software transforms Section 524B evidence management from reactive scrambling to continuous audit readiness.

See how Certivo's medical device cybersecurity compliance software transforms Section 524B evidence management from reactive scrambling to continuous audit readiness.

🤝 Every account includes a dedicated compliance expert alongside CORA.