The European Union has adopted the first delegated act under its Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation, and it directly changes how manufacturers scope their PPWR reuse targets. Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2026/429, adopted on 25 February 2026, exempts economic operators that use pallet wrappings and straps from the 100% reuse requirements of Article 29. For compliance and supply chain leaders, this is a narrowing of obligation, not a removal. The 40% general reuse target still applies. This guide explains what changed, what did not, and how to keep your Article 29 scoping defensible before the 1 January 2030 phase-in.

Book a compliance review to map your PPWR reuse-target exposure across packaging formats and Member States.

Key Takeaways

📌 Delegated Decision (EU) 2026/429 exempts pallet wrappings and straps from the 100% reuse requirements in PPWR Article 29(2) and (3), with entry into force on 26 May 2026.

⚠️ The exemption does not remove these formats from the general 40% reuse target under Article 29(1), which still applies from 1 January 2030.

📄 A corrigendum of 1 April 2026 deleted recital language that had briefly implied exclusion from the 40% target, confirming the exemption is limited to the 100% tier.

⏳ All Article 29 reuse targets phase in from 1 January 2030, so scoping documentation should reflect the layered 40% and 100% structure now.

🏭 Manufacturers, logistics providers, and any operator using pallet wrappings or straps for intra-company, intra-group, or same-Member-State transport are affected.

🔗 Compliance teams should exclude these formats from the 100% tier while continuing to count them toward the 40% pooled target.

🤖 Certivo centralizes PPWR scoping and supporting evidence so teams stay audit-ready as delegated acts and corrigenda change the rules.

What Changed Under Delegated Decision (EU) 2026/429

The Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation, Regulation (EU) 2025/40, entered into force on 11 February 2025 and applies generally from 12 August 2026. It sets binding reuse, recyclability, and recycled-content requirements across all packaging placed on the EU market. Article 29 governs reuse targets for transport packaging.

On 25 February 2026, the European Commission adopted Commission Delegated Decision (EU) 2026/429, document C(2026) 511 final. It is confirmed as the first delegated act adopted under the PPWR. Acting under Article 29(18) point (a), which lets the Commission grant exemptions where a specific sector faces particular economic constraints, the Decision exempts pallet wrappings and straps used for stabilisation and protection of palletised goods from the 100% reuse requirements in Article 29(2) and (3).

The Commission based the exemption on a feasibility study and targeted stakeholder consultation held between 10 December 2025 and 9 January 2026. It concluded that mandating full reuse of these formats would create disproportionate adaptation costs without commensurate environmental benefit, and that no proven reusable alternative exists at scale that guarantees equivalent load stability. The exemption is unconditional within its scope. No separate closed-loop, tracking, or geographic test applies beyond confirming the transport scenario matches Article 29(2) or (3).

For teams tracking the broader packaging agenda, this Decision sits alongside the wider PPWR framework and related extended producer responsibility obligations that manufacturers must scope in parallel.

How the Article 29 Reuse Targets Actually Work

The most common scoping error is treating Article 29 as a single flat 100% requirement. It is not. The article is layered, and the 2026/429 exemption only touches one layer.

The three tiers of Article 29

The 40% target under Article 29(1) covers transport packaging formats such as pallets, foldable plastic boxes, trays, plastic crates, intermediate bulk containers, pails, drums, and canisters. Pallet wrappings and straps remain within this pooled category.

What the exemption removes, and what it keeps

Delegated Decision (EU) 2026/429 removes pallet wrappings and straps from the 100% requirements in Article 29(2) and (3) only. These formats continue to count toward the general 40% target under Article 29(1). In practice, an operator can still meet the 40% pooled target across its transport packaging mix without achieving full reuse of wrappings and straps specifically.

The corrigendum that confirmed the 40% still applies

There is a nuance that compliance teams must record. As originally adopted on 25 February 2026, Recital 2 contained a sentence stating the exemption implied that the Article 29(1) 40% quota also did not apply to these formats. That language went beyond the binding articles and was flagged by Member States. On 1 April 2026, the Commission issued a corrigendum, C(2026) 2361 final, which deleted that sentence. The corrected position is unambiguous. The exemption is confined to the 100% tier, and the 40% target still applies. Any Article 29 scoping memo written before this correction should be re-versioned to reflect the change.

PPWR reuse targets structure showing pallet wrappings and straps exemption by Article 29 tier

Click on image to view full

Which Industries and Operations Are Affected

The exemption is broad in operational reach because pallet wrappings and straps are near-universal in palletised logistics.

🏭 Manufacturers moving finished goods and components on pallets within their own network or between linked enterprises

🔗 Logistics and 3PL providers handling national, business-to-business transport within a single Member State

🏭 Industrial and heavy-equipment producers with high-load palletised shipments, relevant to industrial machinery and heavy equipment operations

🔗 Consumer goods and retail supply chains with high-volume warehouse and fulfilment pallet operations, relevant to consumer goods manufacturers

Any organisation scoping Article 29 obligations should now exclude pallet wrappings and straps from the 100% tier while still counting them toward the general 40% target. Aligning this with your broader sustainability and carbon compliance program prevents duplicated effort across packaging, EPR, and ESG reporting.

Reporting, Documentation, and Scoping Challenges

Article 29 is a data and evidence problem before it is a targets problem. The exemption sharpens that reality.

Layered scoping is hard to maintain manually

Teams must classify each transport packaging format against the correct Article 29 tier, per transport scenario and per Member State. A flat spreadsheet cannot easily represent a format that is exempt from one tier but in scope for another. This is where a centralized compliance data backbone that links packaging formats to obligations by jurisdiction becomes decisive.

Historic state tracking and versioning

The corrigendum illustrates why point-in-time evidence matters. A scoping decision that was defensible under the recital as originally adopted became outdated within weeks. Compliance teams need immutable audit logs, time-stamped declarations, and the ability to run point-in-time queries that show which rule was in force when a decision was made. Treating regulatory scope as a versioned dataset, not a static document, is the difference between an orderly update and a scramble.

Evidence chain integrity

For customer and regulatory scrutiny, the questions are consistent. Who classified this format, when, and under what legal authority. Recording the provenance of each scoping decision, including the specific delegated act and corrigendum relied upon, keeps your position auditable. This mirrors the customer trust center approach used by large OEMs, where suppliers must produce current evidence on demand rather than reconstruct it later. Maintaining continuous audit-ready documentation shortens response time when those requests arrive.

PPWR reuse targets scoping and evidence workflow for transport packaging compliance

Click on image to view full

Compliance Risks and Enforcement Exposure

PPWR is enforced through national competent authorities and market surveillance under the framework of Regulation (EU) 2019/1020. The practical exposure for manufacturers falls into four audit contexts.

📄 Regulatory inspections by Member State market surveillance authorities checking Article 29 conformity

🔗 Customer audits driven by OEMs and retailers requiring proof of correct reuse-target scoping from suppliers

📊 Certification audits under environmental management systems such as ISO 14001, where reuse data supports the wider claim

⚠️ Internal audits validating that scoping keeps pace with delegated acts and corrigenda

No software makes a program audit-proof. The realistic objective is to be audit-ready, reducing surprises and response time. The risk with the 2026/429 exemption specifically is over-application. Excluding pallet wrappings and straps from the 40% target, which the corrigendum expressly corrected, would understate an operator's reuse obligation and create a defensible-looking but incorrect position. Grounding scoping in materials and environmental compliance data reduces that risk.

Key Dates and Enforcement Outlook

Based on currently available regulatory guidance, this Decision is the first of several expected delegated and implementing acts under the PPWR. Reuse-target scope, methodologies, and format definitions will continue to be refined. Building regulatory intelligence and horizon scanning into your process now, rather than reacting to each act, is the more durable posture.

PPWR reuse targets compliance timeline from 2026 delegated decision to 2030 deadline

Click on image to view full

PPWR Compliance Preparation Checklist

✓ Re-version your Article 29 scoping to reflect the layered 40% and 100% structure, replacing any flat 100% assumption.

✓ Flag pallet wrappings and straps as exempt from the 100% tier in Article 29(2) and (3) scenarios, effective 26 May 2026.

✓ Keep those formats in the 40% target under Article 29(1), and confirm this against the 1 April 2026 corrigendum.

✓ Remove any closed-loop or geographic verification test for the exemption. None exists beyond matching the transport scenario.

✓ Attach the legal basis and effective date to each scoping decision, including the Decision and its corrigendum.

✓ Establish version control so future delegated acts update scope without losing the historic record.

✓ Align packaging scoping with EPR and ESG reporting to avoid duplicated data collection across frameworks.

The Customer Audit Readiness Scorecard helps quality and compliance teams self-assess documentation completeness, historic-state retrievability, and hours-to-audit-pack across PPWR, EPR, and related obligations.

How AI-Native Compliance Automation Reduces the PPWR Burden

Manual tracking cannot keep pace with a regulation that changed materially through a corrigendum within five weeks of adoption. AI-native compliance automation addresses the structural gaps.

Certivo acts as the system of record for PPWR reuse-target scoping. It maps each packaging format to the correct Article 29 tier by transport scenario and Member State, and it holds the supporting evidence in one place. CORA-powered regulatory intelligence monitors delegated acts, corrigenda, and guidance, then flags where a change affects your existing scope, so the shift from the original Recital 2 to the corrected version becomes a tracked update rather than a missed one.

For teams already managing multiple frameworks, this connects packaging obligations to extended producer responsibility, ecodesign under the EU ESPR, and forthcoming digital product passport requirements within a single continuous compliance monitoring and audit readiness workflow. The result is a shift from reactive scoping to a defensible, current, and centralized position. Explore the platform features or review Certivo's wider regulatory frameworks library to see coverage across the EU packaging and sustainability agenda.

Executive Conclusion

Delegated Decision (EU) 2026/429 is a narrow, practical adjustment to the PPWR reuse targets, not a rollback. Pallet wrappings and straps are exempt from the 100% requirements in Article 29(2) and (3), yet they remain within the 40% general target under Article 29(1), a position the Commission confirmed through its 1 April 2026 corrigendum. The operational lesson is broader than this single act. Reuse-target scope will keep moving, and the organisations that stay compliant will treat regulatory scope as a versioned, evidence-backed dataset rather than a fixed document.

Manufacturers that centralize PPWR scoping, retain point-in-time evidence, and monitor delegated acts continuously will absorb future changes without disruption. Request a compliance review to assess your Article 29 scoping and build a defensible, audit-ready PPWR position ahead of the 1 January 2030 deadline.